I failed to understand through text why accused people and institutions are necessarily evil
I browsed venal tech-trade publications, and tried and failed to read Less Wrong, which was written as if for aliens
I wonder is this because most humans can’t find joy in the merely real, praising deities and trusting in other supernatural stuff like signs and horoscopes, so disbelieving and living in reality is abnormal?
I wonder is this because most humans can’t find joy in the merely real, praising deities and trusting in other supernatural stuff like signs and horoscopes, so disbelieving and living in reality is abnormal?
or more prosaically, because the sequences are written in an idiosyncratic semi-autobiographical style with few citations and often grandiose language, and many people are immediately turned off by that
I don’t think the citations matter much, but the sequences are narrowly optimized—probably unintentionally—to reach people with a worldview and cultural background similar to Eliezer or his younger self. Not necessarily libertarians or people with apocalyptic preoccupations, as the survey results should make clear, but definitely people who have at some point wanted to be Kimball Kinnison or a character similar to him.
The grandiose language is one of the ways this manifests itself, but it’s not the only one. HPMoR aims a little broader, but not by much.
I wonder is this because most humans can’t find joy in the merely real, praising deities and trusting in other supernatural stuff like signs and horoscopes, so disbelieving and living in reality is abnormal?
Well, there is a group of people who are SlateStarCodex readers, but aren’t LessWrong readers. Some of them say that they do not find LessWrong topics interesting, they are often too speculative for them, and they prefer SSC because they want to discuss things like policy and economics. I think that this explanation is applicable in general case as well—most LessWrong topics simply aren’t that interesting to most people and they prefer to spend their time on other websites.
Metamed sounds like a kinda promising startup)
I failed to understand through text why accused people and institutions are necessarily evil
I wonder is this because most humans can’t find joy in the merely real, praising deities and trusting in other supernatural stuff like signs and horoscopes, so disbelieving and living in reality is abnormal?
or more prosaically, because the sequences are written in an idiosyncratic semi-autobiographical style with few citations and often grandiose language, and many people are immediately turned off by that
I don’t think the citations matter much, but the sequences are narrowly optimized—probably unintentionally—to reach people with a worldview and cultural background similar to Eliezer or his younger self. Not necessarily libertarians or people with apocalyptic preoccupations, as the survey results should make clear, but definitely people who have at some point wanted to be Kimball Kinnison or a character similar to him.
The grandiose language is one of the ways this manifests itself, but it’s not the only one. HPMoR aims a little broader, but not by much.
Few citations compared with what? Certainly not an average website.
The Sequences don’t purport to be average.
Well, there is a group of people who are SlateStarCodex readers, but aren’t LessWrong readers. Some of them say that they do not find LessWrong topics interesting, they are often too speculative for them, and they prefer SSC because they want to discuss things like policy and economics. I think that this explanation is applicable in general case as well—most LessWrong topics simply aren’t that interesting to most people and they prefer to spend their time on other websites.