Not really. I’m focused on fully reversible systems here, as they theoretically allow you to reverse errors without dissipating any energy, so the energy stored there can keep on going.
It’s a great advance, and it’s stronger than you think since we don’t need intermediate steps anymore, and I’ll link to the article here:
In retrospect, I agree with you @porby that my estimate was way lower than it should be, and I now think that the chances of reversible computing in total until 2100 is more like 50-90% than 2-3%.
Not really. I’m focused on fully reversible systems here, as they theoretically allow you to reverse errors without dissipating any energy, so the energy stored there can keep on going.
It’s a great advance, and it’s stronger than you think since we don’t need intermediate steps anymore, and I’ll link to the article here:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/computer-scientists-eliminate-pesky-quantum-computations-20220119/
But I’m focused on full reversibility, ie the measurement step can’t be irreversible.
In retrospect, I agree with you @porby that my estimate was way lower than it should be, and I now think that the chances of reversible computing in total until 2100 is more like 50-90% than 2-3%.