I interpreted that as “I did 95% of the work that I said I would do, and one of the other partners did 60% of the work that he committed to do, and the third partner didn’t do anything.” But yeah, if you interpret it as straight-up percentages, it doesn’t really add up...
I could’ve sworn there was a bit in the grandparent that acknowledged this apparent contradiction, and pointed out pair programming as the explanation, but it seems to be gone. That would, in any case, account for the percentages.
...?
I interpreted that as “I did 95% of the work that I said I would do, and one of the other partners did 60% of the work that he committed to do, and the third partner didn’t do anything.” But yeah, if you interpret it as straight-up percentages, it doesn’t really add up...
I read it as CronoDAS implying his group did 55% more work than it needed to, but your interpretation makes as much sense.
I could’ve sworn there was a bit in the grandparent that acknowledged this apparent contradiction, and pointed out pair programming as the explanation, but it seems to be gone. That would, in any case, account for the percentages.
Yeah, I don’t know what happened to that paragraph.