Agreed. And a trans man who doesn’t take hormone would also be affected similarly. I think saying man/woman or male/female is a bit inaccurate in this context because of that (also because not everyone means the same thing when they say male/female; some refer to a biological reality, so having certain genitalia, and some give it the same meaning as man and woman, so a gender identity). I prefer to use a term that is both accurate and unambiguous (+ that encompasses the other realities I mentioned in my former comment, like intersex people and such), even if that means a lengthier sentence.
Ok I understand. So maybe I should switch for another word than produce? Just as plain as “people who have more estrogen than testosterone in their blood”, or something of the likes?
Agreed. And a trans man who doesn’t take hormone would also be affected similarly. I think saying man/woman or male/female is a bit inaccurate in this context because of that (also because not everyone means the same thing when they say male/female; some refer to a biological reality, so having certain genitalia, and some give it the same meaning as man and woman, so a gender identity). I prefer to use a term that is both accurate and unambiguous (+ that encompasses the other realities I mentioned in my former comment, like intersex people and such), even if that means a lengthier sentence.
The problem is that it’s not accurate here as while a trans man has the hormones in their blood they don’t produce them (or at least not all of them).
Ok I understand. So maybe I should switch for another word than produce? Just as plain as “people who have more estrogen than testosterone in their blood”, or something of the likes?
Yes, I think that would match the intended meaning.