That there is no gears level specification is exactly the problem he points out! We don’t know how specify human values
And we don’t know that human values exist as a coherent object either. So his metaethics is “ethics is X” where X is undefined and possibly non existent.
And we don’t know that human values exist as a coherent object either. So his metaethics is “ethics is X” where X is undefined and possibly non existent.
He doesn’t say “ethics is X” and I disagree that this is a summary that advances the conversation.
For any value of X?