Yes. If there’s no way to test your claim that systemic pseudoscientific practice brought about the conjunction fallacy, how can we know?
I have something like a thirty percent chance of correctly determining whether or not you will judge a given experimental design to be biased. Therefore I surely can’t do it.
We should just believe the best experiment anyone did, even if it’s no good?
I don’t know of any experiment that would be any good. I think the experiments of this kind should stop, pending a new idea about how to do fundamentally better ones.
Yes. If there’s no way to test your claim that systemic pseudoscientific practice brought about the conjunction fallacy, how can we know?
I have something like a thirty percent chance of correctly determining whether or not you will judge a given experimental design to be biased. Therefore I surely can’t do it.
No. Of course not.
Ceterum censeo propose an experiment already.
I don’t know of any experiment that would be any good. I think the experiments of this kind should stop, pending a new idea about how to do fundamentally better ones.
Then we’re in invisible dragon territory. I can safely ignore it.