Ah, now this is a very honest and revealing statement. These are two separate issues, of course.
They are not separate issues. The reason for the false statements is the moral agenda.
The possible (asserted, not shown) existence of an agenda might indeed have something to do with what studies were done and how the interpreters presented them. The morality or immorality of this agenda is what is a separate issue.
They are not separate issues. The reason for the false statements is the moral agenda.
The possible (asserted, not shown) existence of an agenda might indeed have something to do with what studies were done and how the interpreters presented them. The morality or immorality of this agenda is what is a separate issue.