A lot of this makes sense. Some of it feels like I haven’t quite understood the frame you’re using (and unfortunately can’t specify further which parts those are because it’s a bit confusing)
One thing that seems relevant: My preference to “declare staghunts first and get explicit buy in before trying to do anything cooperatively-challenging” feels quite related to “ambiguity over who is in the ingroup causes problems” thing.
A lot of this makes sense. Some of it feels like I haven’t quite understood the frame you’re using (and unfortunately can’t specify further which parts those are because it’s a bit confusing)
One thing that seems relevant: My preference to “declare staghunts first and get explicit buy in before trying to do anything cooperatively-challenging” feels quite related to “ambiguity over who is in the ingroup causes problems” thing.