Honestly, the problem with this approach is that it tends to degenerate to “when my side tells lies, they’re still emotionally true; when the other side makes inconvenient statements that are true, I can dismiss them as emotionally false”.
That is what most people are already doing. It has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are no advantages to being oblivious to how people are thinking
Honestly, the problem with this approach is that it tends to degenerate to “when my side tells lies, they’re still emotionally true; when the other side makes inconvenient statements that are true, I can dismiss them as emotionally false”.
That’s harder to do when you have an explicit understanding.
That is what most people are already doing. It has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are no advantages to being oblivious to how people are thinking