For a true Bayesian, information would never have negative expected utility.
That’s because they already have it (in a sense that we don’t). They know every way any experiment could go (if not which one it will).
I understand that this means to just ask for advice, not necessarily follow it.
You have more at stake than they do. (Also watch out for if they have vested interests.)
EDIT: If you have an amazing knockdown counter-argument, please share it.
That’s because they already have it (in a sense that we don’t). They know every way any experiment could go (if not which one it will).
You have more at stake than they do. (Also watch out for if they have vested interests.)
EDIT: If you have an amazing knockdown counter-argument, please share it.