I see your point. But if water didn’t always boil at the same temperature, why would we bother inventing thermometers?
We have more need to measure the unpredictable than the predictable.
If there was nothing with constant temperature, thermometers would work very differently. My first instinct was to say they wouldn’t work at all. But then I remembered the entire field of economics, so your point stands.
Not every one sees things that way. The more hardline claims require the physical map to exclude others.
Good luck with that. I couldn’t calculate the behaviour of the quarks in a single hydrogen atom if my life depended on it.
If there was nothing with constant temperature, thermometers would work very differently. My first instinct was to say they wouldn’t work at all. But then I remembered the entire field of economics, so your point stands.
Good luck with that. I couldn’t calculate the behaviour of the quarks in a single hydrogen atom if my life depended on it.