Wait But Why’s Why Cryonics Makes Sense is a great overview. Some reasons that come to my mind:
Issues with the initial preservation
Preservation doesn’t last
We never develop the technology necessary for revival
Social reasons why future generations don’t choose to revive
Legal reasons why future generations don’t choose to revive
The cyronics organization having financial issues
Humanity is wiped out by one of the many existential risks we face
Also, I collected some these data points in the past regarding what various people who I respect think about the probability of revival:
Steven Harris (Alcor): 0.2-15%
Michael Perry (Alcor): 13-77%
Robin Hanson: 6%
Experienced LWers: 15%
Inexperienced LWers: 21%
Ralph Merkle: >85% (conditional on things like good preservation, no dystopia, and nanotech)
A lot of people don’t give numbers because it’s too speculative. (Ben Best)
69 super smart leading scientists say that it’s a “credible possibility”. (Although there’s suspiciously few neuroscientists)
Note that these predictions are all however many years old and the authors might have since changed their minds.
Also: Metaculus gives 4% for revival happening before 2050, and 5% for personal revival.
Wait But Why’s Why Cryonics Makes Sense is a great overview. Some reasons that come to my mind:
Issues with the initial preservation
Preservation doesn’t last
We never develop the technology necessary for revival
Social reasons why future generations don’t choose to revive
Legal reasons why future generations don’t choose to revive
The cyronics organization having financial issues
Humanity is wiped out by one of the many existential risks we face
Also, I collected some these data points in the past regarding what various people who I respect think about the probability of revival:
Steven Harris (Alcor): 0.2-15%
Michael Perry (Alcor): 13-77%
Robin Hanson: 6%
Experienced LWers: 15%
Inexperienced LWers: 21%
Ralph Merkle: >85% (conditional on things like good preservation, no dystopia, and nanotech)
A lot of people don’t give numbers because it’s too speculative. (Ben Best)
69 super smart leading scientists say that it’s a “credible possibility”. (Although there’s suspiciously few neuroscientists)
Note that these predictions are all however many years old and the authors might have since changed their minds.
Also: Metaculus gives 4% for revival happening before 2050, and 5% for personal revival.