Sure 23583450863409854 might not refer to any abstract concept fro you.
But I would hold that 23583450863409854 is a valid target for numerology and I would not be surprised if a numerologist did connect that number to some abstract concepts.
You need background education in general to understand a language. No statement is really free of auxillary hypotheses.
In the limit you don’t need any external prompt to start activating concepts you have gathered or booting up your imagination. But for some psychologies they don’t automatically try to match every theory they know against every percept they have but only apply concepts very selectively. Sometime you proposefully make that selectivity wider but it’s hard to say which level of selectivity is appropriate. On the other end there is akrasia where you don’t answer direct questions but only activate your brain when somebody punches you in the face. And in the other extreme being constantly paranoid about everything can burn a lot of energy and thinktime for little improvement.
23583450863409854 is not a perspective that helps me get a new view on a problem I’m considering.
1. This post addressed that—pair your RNG with an advice table.
2. That’s because you don’t give meaning to “numbers”. Try a random word/sentence/advice generator.
Sure 23583450863409854 might not refer to any abstract concept fro you.
But I would hold that 23583450863409854 is a valid target for numerology and I would not be surprised if a numerologist did connect that number to some abstract concepts.
You need the numerology to get your perspective. It’s similar to the source of the 64 bits of entropy for the I Ching.
You need background education in general to understand a language. No statement is really free of auxillary hypotheses.
In the limit you don’t need any external prompt to start activating concepts you have gathered or booting up your imagination. But for some psychologies they don’t automatically try to match every theory they know against every percept they have but only apply concepts very selectively. Sometime you proposefully make that selectivity wider but it’s hard to say which level of selectivity is appropriate. On the other end there is akrasia where you don’t answer direct questions but only activate your brain when somebody punches you in the face. And in the other extreme being constantly paranoid about everything can burn a lot of energy and thinktime for little improvement.