I mean, just make your own opinion on how much the content of Less Wrong as you see it here actually resembles the thing that is described at Wikipedia.
The problem here is that the goal of Wikipedia isn’t to describe LessWrong as it’s seen by someone who goes to LessWrong but how LessWrong is seen by reliably secondary sources.
The problem here is that the goal of Wikipedia isn’t to describe LessWrong as it’s seen by someone who goes to LessWrong but how LessWrong is seen by reliably secondary sources.