Still, when several individually-questionable pieces of evidence are pointing in one direction, and nothing in particular is pointing in the other, that seems like the correct conclusion. I think the story is probably true.
…Huh? The entire rest of the post gave me the exact opposite impression. It sounds like most of the evidence points to the story being false, while hardly anything points to the story being true. Did I miss something?
I think I explain this in the last section? There are several statements he makes that at least imply he doesn’t consider it torture, and I couldn’t find any with the opposite implication.
…Huh? The entire rest of the post gave me the exact opposite impression. It sounds like most of the evidence points to the story being false, while hardly anything points to the story being true. Did I miss something?
I think I explain this in the last section? There are several statements he makes that at least imply he doesn’t consider it torture, and I couldn’t find any with the opposite implication.