Not particularly, no. In fact, there probably is no such method—either the parties must agree to disagree (which they could honestly do if they’re not all Bayesians), or they must persuade each other using rhetoric as opposed to honest, rational inquiry. I find this unfortunate.
Not particularly, no. In fact, there probably is no such method—either the parties must agree to disagree (which they could honestly do if they’re not all Bayesians), or they must persuade each other using rhetoric as opposed to honest, rational inquiry. I find this unfortunate.
Could you elaborate on that? Sorry, I just don’t get it.
It’s a hint at Aumann’s theorem.
Oh, I wasn’t aware that they had to be Bayesian for that rule to apply, thanks for the help.