I would have to do a fair bit of work to find them—for obvious reasons, they dont need to be added to any Endnote collection. A lot are, “yes, you found a error with our methods but when we fix it, it doesnt change the conclusions”—trans “bite your bum”. https://retractionwatch.com/ can be a place to find the really bad stuff. (oh and I see a full blown public change of mind right now—https://retractionwatch.com/2021/05/06/rejection-overruled-retraction-ensues-when-annoyed-reviewer-does-deep-dive-into-data/ )
Ah, that’s fair. I figure sometimes people remember good jokes/memes, but if the retractions aren’t quite there, they wouldn’t be worth noting. Thank you for the link!
One quickly. http://www.ask-force.org/web/Global-Warming/moerner-comment-on-comment-2008.pdf is comment on comment. Read the Nerem et al comment http://www.aari.ru/docs/pub/070119/ner07.pdf which is fun. Some commentary here: https://skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=691#47808
I would have to do a fair bit of work to find them—for obvious reasons, they dont need to be added to any Endnote collection. A lot are, “yes, you found a error with our methods but when we fix it, it doesnt change the conclusions”—trans “bite your bum”.
https://retractionwatch.com/ can be a place to find the really bad stuff. (oh and I see a full blown public change of mind right now—https://retractionwatch.com/2021/05/06/rejection-overruled-retraction-ensues-when-annoyed-reviewer-does-deep-dive-into-data/ )
Ah, that’s fair. I figure sometimes people remember good jokes/memes, but if the retractions aren’t quite there, they wouldn’t be worth noting. Thank you for the link!
One quickly. http://www.ask-force.org/web/Global-Warming/moerner-comment-on-comment-2008.pdf is comment on comment. Read the Nerem et al comment http://www.aari.ru/docs/pub/070119/ner07.pdf which is fun. Some commentary here: https://skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=691#47808