Is it still somewhat controversial? Meaning, are there respected physicists who think that conscious observers do magically cause things to happen?
Roger Penrose is very respected.
But “conscious observers do magically cause things to happen” isn’t a good description of his hypothesis.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Is it still somewhat controversial? Meaning, are there respected physicists who think that conscious observers do magically cause things to happen?
Roger Penrose is very respected.
But “conscious observers do magically cause things to happen” isn’t a good description of his hypothesis.