The definition of art begins to matter a lot when governments have bizarre laws that require spending public funds on it—e.g. Seattle’s SMC 20.32.030 “Funds for works of art” which states that “All requests for appropriations for construction projects from eligible funds shall include an amount equal to one (1) percent of the estimated cost of such project for works of art...”
Of course, the law doesn’t even attempt to define what is and isn’t “art”. They leave that up to the Office of Arts and Cultural Affairs… and I’m sure those folks spend PLENTY of time (also at public expense) debating exactly that question.
The definition of art begins to matter a lot when governments have bizarre laws that require spending public funds on it—e.g. Seattle’s SMC 20.32.030 “Funds for works of art” which states that “All requests for appropriations for construction projects from eligible funds shall include an amount equal to one (1) percent of the estimated cost of such project for works of art...”
Of course, the law doesn’t even attempt to define what is and isn’t “art”. They leave that up to the Office of Arts and Cultural Affairs… and I’m sure those folks spend PLENTY of time (also at public expense) debating exactly that question.