Fun post, but insofar as it’s mostly expository of some basic game theory ideas, I think it doesn’t do a good enough job of communicating that the starting assumption is that one is in a contrived (but logically possible) equilibrium. Scott Alexander’s example is clearer about this. So I am not giving it a positive vote in the review (though I would for an edited version that fixed this issue).
Fun post, but insofar as it’s mostly expository of some basic game theory ideas, I think it doesn’t do a good enough job of communicating that the starting assumption is that one is in a contrived (but logically possible) equilibrium. Scott Alexander’s example is clearer about this. So I am not giving it a positive vote in the review (though I would for an edited version that fixed this issue).