even though this particular experiment was not helpful
Not helpful? How do you figure? From where I stand, we won’t be able to draw any conclusions about that until several days from now, after seeing how things play out.
your method may have caused collateral damage,
Elaborate, please.
and your conclusion was poorly supported. On the other hand, you had a chart that presented a poorly-supported hypothesis as fact.
How do you mean? Obviously it wasn’t a rigorously controlled experiment, up to acedemic standards—it wasn’t supposed to be. But I’m not aware of any obvious flaws. As stated elsewhere in the thread:
the “troll thread” had been pretty much dead for about 12 hours or so when the “dishonesty” comment got posted… and 60 seconds later resulted in deletion … the unlikelihood of that being coincidental seems astronomical.
Or are you referring to something else? Please elaborate.
Your dishonesty was the last straw.
I’ve never been more honest in my life. What do you mean?
Not helpful? How do you figure? From where I stand, we won’t be able to draw any conclusions about that until several days from now, after seeing how things play out.
Elaborate, please.
How do you mean? Obviously it wasn’t a rigorously controlled experiment, up to acedemic standards—it wasn’t supposed to be. But I’m not aware of any obvious flaws. As stated elsewhere in the thread:
Or are you referring to something else? Please elaborate.
I’ve never been more honest in my life. What do you mean?