I think their argument was that they don’t support Pascal’s Mugging and they don’t see any proof of medical research within reach that could end aging with a significant probability.
EDIT: …and I should have read the comment in more detail. You are talking about stuff such as donating to curing diseases. I think they just didn’t assign analysts to this yet. I guess it’s hard to measure scientific progress.
I think their argument was that they don’t support Pascal’s Mugging and they don’t see any proof of medical research within reach that could end aging with a significant probability.
EDIT: …and I should have read the comment in more detail. You are talking about stuff such as donating to curing diseases. I think they just didn’t assign analysts to this yet. I guess it’s hard to measure scientific progress.