To clarify, Q#1 is querying what constitutes “understanding”, using Sarah (not Mike) as an example. If a person can articulate information but can’t, for whatever reason, make use of the information, is that “understanding”? (And doesn’t that happen a lot around here?)
Q#2 is querying just how useful it is to endlessly analyse and explain gender differences, when you can just accept that there are differences and get on with talking to each other.
To clarify, Q#1 is querying what constitutes “understanding”, using Sarah (not Mike) as an example. If a person can articulate information but can’t, for whatever reason, make use of the information, is that “understanding”? (And doesn’t that happen a lot around here?)
Q#2 is querying just how useful it is to endlessly analyse and explain gender differences, when you can just accept that there are differences and get on with talking to each other.