Because “signing” comments is not customary here, doing so signals a certain aloofness or distance from the community
No. I am very confident the intention was to signal that Luke was not being emotionally affected by the intense criticism for the purpose of appearing to be leader type material, which is substantially not aloofness from the community.
It’s not a convincing signal primarily because it’s idiosyncracy highlights it for analysis, but I still think the above holds.
I am very confident the intention was to signal that Luke was not being emotionally affected by the intense criticism for the purpose of appearing to be leader type material
Or, in another words, signaling high status—just like I said.
which is substantially not aloofness from the community.
It may not be aloofness, but it certainly is distance (I used two words for a reason); a leader is, necessarily, separated in some way from those who are led.
No. I am very confident the intention was to signal that Luke was not being emotionally affected by the intense criticism for the purpose of appearing to be leader type material, which is substantially not aloofness from the community.
It’s not a convincing signal primarily because it’s idiosyncracy highlights it for analysis, but I still think the above holds.
Or, in another words, signaling high status—just like I said.
It may not be aloofness, but it certainly is distance (I used two words for a reason); a leader is, necessarily, separated in some way from those who are led.