The words “intrinsic value” when applied to money have a well-known and sufficiently defined meaning. You are welcome to insist that the term is wrong, but I don’t see much point if you want to talk to other people.
I understand what you are saying and you are correct that value is not a property of a “thing itself”, it’s just that this observation is irrelevant in the context.
The words “intrinsic value” when applied to money have a well-known and sufficiently defined meaning. You are welcome to insist that the term is wrong, but I don’t see much point if you want to talk to other people.
I understand what you are saying and you are correct that value is not a property of a “thing itself”, it’s just that this observation is irrelevant in the context.
Can you explain or link to more info about:
Wikipedia: “Intrinsic value (numismatics)”
See also use value and exchange value.