The biggest problems with cars are traffic congestion and parking space. I assume your wagons can be stacked on top of each other? If so, the human world would essentially become a giant warehouse where trucks move human-containers from one stack to another? Doesn’t sound so much better than cities with robotaxis.
And a quote from there: the future of urban mobility is transit, cycling, and walking, not autonomobiles driven by humans or artificial intelligence. Self-driving cars will never be a mass mobility option, and people shouldn’t be given false assurances to the contrary.
How does either robotaxi or “personal wagon” solve the mobility problem?
Well, here are some ways robotaxis *could* contribute to solving urban mobility:
One limiting factor of cars? Congestion. Robot cars, communicating with each other, don’t need the safe headways for slow human reaction times, and can—potentially—co-ordinate themselves around gridlock.
Trying to travel around on a bicycle? Dumb meatbag drivers may run into you; will robots be better at that? We certainly *hope* so. Same for walking. Also...
Parking space! Robotaxis don’t have to park right next to the destination—so robotaxis are at least somewhat compatible with high density development, more so than private cars
If single-occupant cars aren’t providing adequate density, there’s nothing to stop the use of adequate-sized buses—something between the size of a minibus and a transit bus—at least out of downtown to “railheads” (the “last mile” concept alluded to).
How feasible is any of this? Hard to tell, too many hypotheticals. The “radical urbanist” article is only interested in scenarios in which robotaxis are completely ineffective (don’t work, too expensive) or completely disastrous (cause ultimate gridlock, which no government is capable of doing anything about).
The biggest problems with cars are traffic congestion and parking space. I assume your wagons can be stacked on top of each other? If so, the human world would essentially become a giant warehouse where trucks move human-containers from one stack to another? Doesn’t sound so much better than cities with robotaxis.
I’ll add a link: https://medium.com/radical-urbanist/a-million-tesla-robotaxis-would-cripple-urban-transport-f8b50223d8c2
And a quote from there: the future of urban mobility is transit, cycling, and walking, not autonomobiles driven by humans or artificial intelligence. Self-driving cars will never be a mass mobility option, and people shouldn’t be given false assurances to the contrary.
How does either robotaxi or “personal wagon” solve the mobility problem?
Well, here are some ways robotaxis *could* contribute to solving urban mobility:
One limiting factor of cars? Congestion. Robot cars, communicating with each other, don’t need the safe headways for slow human reaction times, and can—potentially—co-ordinate themselves around gridlock.
Trying to travel around on a bicycle? Dumb meatbag drivers may run into you; will robots be better at that? We certainly *hope* so. Same for walking. Also...
Parking space! Robotaxis don’t have to park right next to the destination—so robotaxis are at least somewhat compatible with high density development, more so than private cars
If single-occupant cars aren’t providing adequate density, there’s nothing to stop the use of adequate-sized buses—something between the size of a minibus and a transit bus—at least out of downtown to “railheads” (the “last mile” concept alluded to).
How feasible is any of this? Hard to tell, too many hypotheticals. The “radical urbanist” article is only interested in scenarios in which robotaxis are completely ineffective (don’t work, too expensive) or completely disastrous (cause ultimate gridlock, which no government is capable of doing anything about).