Which you also can’t know if you don’t test other fields. I think there are at least 3 concentric levels to distinguish : ( famous ( intelligent ( STEM ) ) ).
Some sports players are pretty smart and probably some governors aren’t. What about ( Reality TV celebrities ( heads of state of UNSC countries ( Physicists / Mathematicians / Engineers ) ) ).
(1 minute of thought did not provide another group of famous & not-even-a-little-bit-selected-for-intelligence people, unless there’s a database of lottery winners, which I doubt. Curious for suggestions.)
Which you also can’t know if you don’t test other fields. I think there are at least 3 concentric levels to distinguish : ( famous ( intelligent ( STEM ) ) ).
So potentially ( Sports players ( Literature laureates / governors ( Physicists / Mathematicians ) ) ) ?
Some sports players are pretty smart and probably some governors aren’t. What about ( Reality TV celebrities ( heads of state of UNSC countries ( Physicists / Mathematicians / Engineers ) ) ).
(1 minute of thought did not provide another group of famous & not-even-a-little-bit-selected-for-intelligence people, unless there’s a database of lottery winners, which I doubt. Curious for suggestions.)
(Famous engineers: of course Wikipedia does not disappoint.)
That’s a good point, which applies to both this and the prior post. The reason ‘Nobel’ Laureates are easy is probably the fame component.