Caledonian:
“Since we can’t extrapolate our physics that far, we don’t know whether they’re truly compatible with our understanding of physics or not.”
For the sake for argument, I’ll let that stand (as a conflict of minor importance). Still, why should we go and assume a non-reductionist model? That’s multiplying entities beyond necessity.
Caledonian: “Since we can’t extrapolate our physics that far, we don’t know whether they’re truly compatible with our understanding of physics or not.” For the sake for argument, I’ll let that stand (as a conflict of minor importance). Still, why should we go and assume a non-reductionist model? That’s multiplying entities beyond necessity.