There’s a very tiny percentage chance that there’s a completely unexpected long-term complication. Widespread distribution and vaccination with such a complication could be extinction-level.
Uhuh, and waiting a year will help us avoid this how? I mean maybe not giving it to the people in the underground bunker that we’ve stuck a breeding population in that can repopulate the earth after the non killer robot apocalypse makes sense on these grounds, but they aren’t going to catch Covid-19 anyways.
If it starts to kill everyone within 14 months, we’ll almost certainly know before everyone in poor countries gets it distributed to them, and then the underdeveloped inherit the world.
The odds that there’s some serious side effect that isn’t extinction-level are many orders of magnitude higher, and the approval system was made in advance with the full knowledge and careful consideration of the potential of epidemics.
Based on my priors about how groups like the FDA and CDC work that seems unlikely to be true. My strong impression is that the system is designed to minimize the odds of things going wrong in a way that will generate headlines based on errors of commission.
Is there any source showing how the decided on this trial duration as something that would balance the risks involved with a deadly epidemic?
I believe so, but I lack the requisite domain-specific knowledge to extract it, or even to evaluate those reasons once they have been extracted.
The thing about the size of the federal government is that there was a team of people with domain-specific knowledge integrating and responsive to public comments and suggestions from people with and without domain-specific knowledge. Their records *ARE* available, if you can figure out what to ask for.
The general summary is probably fairly accurate, but it would be a major error to think that the actual policy was strictly to highly optimize for the fairly accurate summary.
There’s a very tiny percentage chance that there’s a completely unexpected long-term complication. Widespread distribution and vaccination with such a complication could be extinction-level.
Uhuh, and waiting a year will help us avoid this how? I mean maybe not giving it to the people in the underground bunker that we’ve stuck a breeding population in that can repopulate the earth after the non killer robot apocalypse makes sense on these grounds, but they aren’t going to catch Covid-19 anyways.
If it starts to kill everyone within 14 months, we’ll almost certainly know before everyone in poor countries gets it distributed to them, and then the underdeveloped inherit the world.
The odds that there’s some serious side effect that isn’t extinction-level are many orders of magnitude higher, and the approval system was made in advance with the full knowledge and careful consideration of the potential of epidemics.
Based on my priors about how groups like the FDA and CDC work that seems unlikely to be true. My strong impression is that the system is designed to minimize the odds of things going wrong in a way that will generate headlines based on errors of commission.
Is there any source showing how the decided on this trial duration as something that would balance the risks involved with a deadly epidemic?
I believe so, but I lack the requisite domain-specific knowledge to extract it, or even to evaluate those reasons once they have been extracted.
The thing about the size of the federal government is that there was a team of people with domain-specific knowledge integrating and responsive to public comments and suggestions from people with and without domain-specific knowledge. Their records *ARE* available, if you can figure out what to ask for.
The general summary is probably fairly accurate, but it would be a major error to think that the actual policy was strictly to highly optimize for the fairly accurate summary.