His attitude after hearing the prophecy can be summed up by his words to McGonagall, which are consistent with everything he does thereafter
I would say that his request to McGonagall is consistent with my theory—he knew that her attempts to stop Harry would have the opposite effect. I am guessing that Quirrell has some alternate interpretation to the prophecy.
One possibility for this is “The End of the World” corresponds to an change to the natural order that makes the world unrecognizable, such as the removal of mortality.
It is possible that instead of burning up his own life to destroy all the dementors or defeat death, Harry could burn up some stars, which could explain the rest of the prophecy.
I’m not saying that I am correct, but I still see no actions that are inconsistent with my theory.
I think part of the confusion is that we are interpreting the punctuation differently. I don’t interpret your second quotation (first quotation from the text) as meaning that he was happy, until interrupted by hearing the prophecy, but rather that the prophecy was the reason he had smiled.
Regarding the sequence of events, here’s how it goes:
Trelawney, who had been sitting behind him on the two-person broomstick that had just blazed through Hogwarts burning directly through all the walls and floors in their way, hastily pulled herself off and then sat down hard on the floor, a pace away from the red-glowing edges of a newly made gap in the wall. The woman was still breathing in gasps, bending over herself as though she were on the verge of vomiting out something larger than she was.
[Quirrell analyses the emotions he’d felt coming off Harry]
Unseen by anyone, the Defense Professor’s lips curved up in a thin smile. Despite its little ups and downs, on the whole this had been a surprisingly good day -
“HE IS HERE. THE ONE WHO WILL TEAR APART THE VERY STARS IN HEAVEN. HE IS HERE. HE IS THE END OF THE WORLD.”
(quoted from hpmor.com rather than the .pdf this time for greater accuracy)
I really don’t see how you can get any sequence of events out of that other than “Trelawney is about to make prophecy → Quirrell analyses Harry’s emotions and is happy with what he finds → Trelawney makes prophecy”. Quirrell doesn’t even get a full stop at the end of his thought before the quote marks open for Trelawney to speak.
I must admit, this makes my theory less likely, but I still don’t see your reading as the unambiguously correct interpretation, but I will freely cede that it look plausible that it is an interrupt, not an elaboration. This may, in part, stem from the fact that I am a big proponent of using “-” in my writing, and my usage is somewhat nonstandard.
Even if that is right, I don’t think it rules out my guess about Quirrell’s plan, but again, I’m significantly less confident now.
I would say that his request to McGonagall is consistent with my theory—he knew that her attempts to stop Harry would have the opposite effect. I am guessing that Quirrell has some alternate interpretation to the prophecy.
One possibility for this is “The End of the World” corresponds to an change to the natural order that makes the world unrecognizable, such as the removal of mortality.
It is possible that instead of burning up his own life to destroy all the dementors or defeat death, Harry could burn up some stars, which could explain the rest of the prophecy.
I’m not saying that I am correct, but I still see no actions that are inconsistent with my theory.
I think part of the confusion is that we are interpreting the punctuation differently. I don’t interpret your second quotation (first quotation from the text) as meaning that he was happy, until interrupted by hearing the prophecy, but rather that the prophecy was the reason he had smiled.
Regarding the sequence of events, here’s how it goes:
(quoted from hpmor.com rather than the .pdf this time for greater accuracy)
I really don’t see how you can get any sequence of events out of that other than “Trelawney is about to make prophecy → Quirrell analyses Harry’s emotions and is happy with what he finds → Trelawney makes prophecy”. Quirrell doesn’t even get a full stop at the end of his thought before the quote marks open for Trelawney to speak.
Fair enough.
I must admit, this makes my theory less likely, but I still don’t see your reading as the unambiguously correct interpretation, but I will freely cede that it look plausible that it is an interrupt, not an elaboration. This may, in part, stem from the fact that I am a big proponent of using “-” in my writing, and my usage is somewhat nonstandard.
Even if that is right, I don’t think it rules out my guess about Quirrell’s plan, but again, I’m significantly less confident now.