I’ll save my defense of these answers for my next post, but here are my answers:
Both of them.
Yes. The way I understand these words, this is a tautology.
No. Actually, hell no.
N/A
Yes; a. I’m not quite sure how to make sense of “probability” here, but something strictly between 0 and 1; b. Yes.
Negligibly larger than 0.
1, tautologically.
For the purposes of this discussion, “No”. In an unrelated discussion about epistemology, “No, with caveats.”
This question is nonsense.
No.
If I answered “yes” to this, it would imply that I did not think question 11 was nonsense, leading to contradiction.
I’ll save my defense of these answers for my next post, but here are my answers:
Both of them.
Yes. The way I understand these words, this is a tautology.
No. Actually, hell no.
N/A
Yes; a. I’m not quite sure how to make sense of “probability” here, but something strictly between 0 and 1; b. Yes.
Negligibly larger than 0.
1, tautologically.
For the purposes of this discussion, “No”. In an unrelated discussion about epistemology, “No, with caveats.”
This question is nonsense.
No.
If I answered “yes” to this, it would imply that I did not think question 11 was nonsense, leading to contradiction.