I particularly like the first suggestion as an extremely simple and lightweight modification to the standard procedure. OTOH, it does incentivise rather dishonest reports (since players still want to strategically take under-covered ranges).
The second proposal is pretty good as well, although to avoid the complexity of “do not overlap OR cover a different number of values” I might prefer to simply allow ties.
Two good suggestions!
I particularly like the first suggestion as an extremely simple and lightweight modification to the standard procedure. OTOH, it does incentivise rather dishonest reports (since players still want to strategically take under-covered ranges).
The second proposal is pretty good as well, although to avoid the complexity of “do not overlap OR cover a different number of values” I might prefer to simply allow ties.