We need to figure out the cost-benefit ratio of saltwater-spraying-for-salt-molecule-cloud-seeding vs sulfur-contaminate-in-fuel method. Nice short explanation:
[main summary is entirely redundant with the post]
[most itemized summary was also redundant]
Geoengineering would need to be done carefully and intentionally, rather than the current reckless and haphazard pollution.
As the impacts of climate change become more severe, humanity will likely need to not only reduce carbon emissions but also remove existing CO2 and mitigate impacts through geoengineering.
There are alternative ways to seed clouds for geoengineering purposes that do not involve sulfur dioxide, such as spraying sea water.
Discussing geoengineering now does not mean giving up on reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to renewable energy.
it’s not terribly in depth, but I guess those are additional points. more details are in the video, but not a lot more.
We need to figure out the cost-benefit ratio of saltwater-spraying-for-salt-molecule-cloud-seeding vs sulfur-contaminate-in-fuel method. Nice short explanation:
via kagi summarizer,
it’s not terribly in depth, but I guess those are additional points. more details are in the video, but not a lot more.