I think people here are uncomfortable advocating for political solutions either because of their views of politics or their comfort level with it.
You don’t have to believe that alignment is impossible to conclude that you should advocate for a political/​governmental solution. All you have to believe is that the probability of x-risk from AGI is reasonably high and the probably of alignment working to prevent it it not reasonably high. That seems to describe the belief of most of those on LessWrong.
I think people here are uncomfortable advocating for political solutions either because of their views of politics or their comfort level with it.
You don’t have to believe that alignment is impossible to conclude that you should advocate for a political/​governmental solution. All you have to believe is that the probability of x-risk from AGI is reasonably high and the probably of alignment working to prevent it it not reasonably high. That seems to describe the belief of most of those on LessWrong.