This is similar to choosing strict determinism over compatibilism. Which players are the “best” depends on each of those players’ individual efforts during the game. You could extend the idea to the executives too, anyway—which groups of executives acquire better players is largely a function of which have the best executives.
Efforts are only one variable here, and the quote did say “largely a function of”. Those being said, look at how often teams replay each other during a season with a different winner.
This is similar to choosing strict determinism over compatibilism. Which players are the “best” depends on each of those players’ individual efforts during the game. You could extend the idea to the executives too, anyway—which groups of executives acquire better players is largely a function of which have the best executives.
Efforts are only one variable here, and the quote did say “largely a function of”. Those being said, look at how often teams replay each other during a season with a different winner.