I spent a couple hours looking at different methods to efficiently short long term bonds:
UB Treasury Bond Futures − 30 year bonds but you have to roll every quarter on the roll date which is both a hassle and you pay the spread each time you roll. Also, the expected return if the world stays normal is significantly negative, it should be the 30 year rate minus the risk free rate, for which the average since 1977 has been 2% per year.
SOFR Futures—pays out based on the average interest rate in a specific 3 month time period up to 10 years out, though liquidity looks poor past 5 years out. A SOFR Futures strip will have the same returns as the equivalent treasury future, except there’s no need to roll them, and you have more control over the time frame you want to target. (Edit: This paper finds the returns are the same as bond futures but they find them to be around 0.5%, rather than the 2% I estimated above)
Eris SOFR Swap Futures—you pay/get paid the difference between the fixed rate when you bought it and the current floating rate, for up to 30 years. This sounds EV neutral, plus you wouldn’t need to roll them.
The Eris SOFR Swap Futures sound promising but I would need to do a lot more research before investing, I’m wondering if anyone else has thoughts on this first. I might try and create a model to estimate the expected returns of each type of instrument in a normal world and a slow takeoff 50% rate world.
Edit: According to this thread, all three are functionally identical, so any significant difference in returns should get arbitraged away. If that’s the case, then the Eris Swap Futures seem to have very poor liquidity so I would not recommend them.
However, since they’re architected differently, it’s possible that they are arbitraged to have very similar expected return profiles in normal times, but offer very different returns if interest rates go way out of distribution.
Yeah swaptions would be nice but it seems like the minimum size is $1mm.
Why not just short-sell treasuries (e.g. TLT)?
Futures and options give you a lot more leverage than short selling. A $100k short position on TLT would be $30k of maintenance margin, compared to $7,400 for UB.
And banks and hedge funds arbitrage futures prices against the underlying asset, so trading futures basically gives you access to institutional interest rates instead of retail margin rates. Right now the rate difference for short selling on IBKR is ~5% for accounts <$100k and 1.25% for accounts between $100k and $1mm. Plus the borrow fee which is currently only 0.3% for TLT but would go up if lots of people start shorting it.
I spent a couple hours looking at different methods to efficiently short long term bonds:
UB Treasury Bond Futures − 30 year bonds but you have to roll every quarter on the roll date which is both a hassle and you pay the spread each time you roll. Also, the expected return if the world stays normal is significantly negative, it should be the 30 year rate minus the risk free rate, for which the average since 1977 has been 2% per year.
SOFR Futures—pays out based on the average interest rate in a specific 3 month time period up to 10 years out, though liquidity looks poor past 5 years out. A SOFR Futures strip will have the same returns as the equivalent treasury future, except there’s no need to roll them, and you have more control over the time frame you want to target. (Edit: This paper finds the returns are the same as bond futures but they find them to be around 0.5%, rather than the 2% I estimated above)
Eris SOFR Swap Futures—you pay/get paid the difference between the fixed rate when you bought it and the current floating rate, for up to 30 years. This sounds EV neutral, plus you wouldn’t need to roll them.
The Eris SOFR Swap Futures sound promising but I would need to do a lot more research before investing, I’m wondering if anyone else has thoughts on this first. I might try and create a model to estimate the expected returns of each type of instrument in a normal world and a slow takeoff 50% rate world.
Edit: According to this thread, all three are functionally identical, so any significant difference in returns should get arbitraged away. If that’s the case, then the Eris Swap Futures seem to have very poor liquidity so I would not recommend them.
However, since they’re architected differently, it’s possible that they are arbitraged to have very similar expected return profiles in normal times, but offer very different returns if interest rates go way out of distribution.
Very helpful, thanks. And interesting about the Eris SOFR Swap Futures.
Interest rate swaptions might also be worth looking into, though they may only be available to large institutional investors.
Why not just short-sell treasuries (e.g. TLT)?
Yeah swaptions would be nice but it seems like the minimum size is $1mm.
Futures and options give you a lot more leverage than short selling. A $100k short position on TLT would be $30k of maintenance margin, compared to $7,400 for UB.
And banks and hedge funds arbitrage futures prices against the underlying asset, so trading futures basically gives you access to institutional interest rates instead of retail margin rates. Right now the rate difference for short selling on IBKR is ~5% for accounts <$100k and 1.25% for accounts between $100k and $1mm. Plus the borrow fee which is currently only 0.3% for TLT but would go up if lots of people start shorting it.
Buying TLT puts is worth looking into though.