What about Drescher’s Good and Real: Demystifying Paradoxes from Physics to Ethics? Eliezer said it’s “pratically Less Wrong in book form.”
Not a source, but definitely a parallel.
We have talked about Newcomb’s problem with transparent boxes on here a few times—I’m pretty sure that’s originally from Good and Real.
Yep. Gloriously lucid and quite readable book.Encapsulates good chunks of the sequences.
Much more accessible than I had anticipated.
What about Drescher’s Good and Real: Demystifying Paradoxes from Physics to Ethics? Eliezer said it’s “pratically Less Wrong in book form.”
Not a source, but definitely a parallel.
We have talked about Newcomb’s problem with transparent boxes on here a few times—I’m pretty sure that’s originally from Good and Real.
Yep. Gloriously lucid and quite readable book.
Encapsulates good chunks of the sequences.
Much more accessible than I had anticipated.