I read Oli’s comment as referring to the 2.4% → 0.002% failure rate improvement from filtering.
Ah, that makes sense. But the 26 minutes --> 13 minutes is from adversarial training holding the threshold fixed, right?
Indeed. (Well, holding the quality degradation fixed, which causes a small change in the threshold.)
I read Oli’s comment as referring to the 2.4% → 0.002% failure rate improvement from filtering.
Ah, that makes sense. But the 26 minutes --> 13 minutes is from adversarial training holding the threshold fixed, right?
Indeed. (Well, holding the quality degradation fixed, which causes a small change in the threshold.)