That scenario doesn’t seem terrifying to me, though it’s pretty vague. He says there are job losses and revolution is impossible but so what? Realistically in this scenario people just vote to raise taxes on capital owners and give themselves a paycheck. Machine labor is apparently extremely capable and near-free in this scenario so owning even a small amount of capital makes you effectively rich in absolute but not relative terms. I guess he’s assuming democracy breaks in a way that is pro-capital owners somewhere along the way but that isn’t actually stated.
Probably not, because people who do not like new society can create a small closed society somewhere where population density is smaller and live off the land.
This is the most terrifying comic SMBC has made yet How much of a point does Zach have, here? Can this be the shape of the future?
Luddites are not new.
That scenario doesn’t seem terrifying to me, though it’s pretty vague. He says there are job losses and revolution is impossible but so what? Realistically in this scenario people just vote to raise taxes on capital owners and give themselves a paycheck. Machine labor is apparently extremely capable and near-free in this scenario so owning even a small amount of capital makes you effectively rich in absolute but not relative terms. I guess he’s assuming democracy breaks in a way that is pro-capital owners somewhere along the way but that isn’t actually stated.
Probably not, because people who do not like new society can create a small closed society somewhere where population density is smaller and live off the land.