I agree that Trump is the clear “worse” option in this election, but this post has a lot of left-leaning bias that makes it feel unconvincing. Several examples:
We see false equivalence playing out in the political arena when commentators claim there is “radicalism” on both sides in reference to radical woke leftists quibbling about pronouns in relation to a mainstream right-wing presidential candidate promising to use the military against the “enemy within”.
You took one of the tamest aspects of the radical left here. That quote by Trump is really pernicious but it could have easily been compared to parallel views of the radical left (who e.g. believe that people who voice certain opinions online should be arrested).
See? There’s antisemitism on both sides
There is antisemitism amongst the pro-Palestine crowd; getting numbers might be hard but I think the easier argument to make is that Kamala is pro-Israel anyway, just less dramatically so.
There is one candidate, Kamala Harris, who cares about expertise (particularly her economic plan, which is lauded by experts), critical thinking and collaboration (her will to work together on the border with Republicans).
She also took power without a single vote by lying to the American public that Biden was mentally healthy until it was too late to have a fair election. It’s hard to believe she would have won the nomination normally, given her 2020 performance. I’m also a little skeptical about her economic plan being that good (aren’t price controls in there?) but I don’t know nearly enough about economics to know for sure.
I think the best aspect of this post is that Nature study.
I agree that Trump is the clear “worse” option in this election, but this post has a lot of left-leaning bias that makes it feel unconvincing. Several examples:
You took one of the tamest aspects of the radical left here. That quote by Trump is really pernicious but it could have easily been compared to parallel views of the radical left (who e.g. believe that people who voice certain opinions online should be arrested).
There is antisemitism amongst the pro-Palestine crowd; getting numbers might be hard but I think the easier argument to make is that Kamala is pro-Israel anyway, just less dramatically so.
She also took power without a single vote by lying to the American public that Biden was mentally healthy until it was too late to have a fair election. It’s hard to believe she would have won the nomination normally, given her 2020 performance. I’m also a little skeptical about her economic plan being that good (aren’t price controls in there?) but I don’t know nearly enough about economics to know for sure.
I think the best aspect of this post is that Nature study.