Doomimir: This is all very interesting, but I don’t think it bears much on the reasons we’re all going to die. It’s all still on the “is” side of the is–ought gap.
I don’t understand what Doomimir is pointing out here—“we’re all going to die” is an “is” claim too.
I think he means the is-ought dilemma inside the AGI—the distinction between its beliefs about what is and its goals for what it thinks ought to happen.
I don’t understand what Doomimir is pointing out here—“we’re all going to die” is an “is” claim too.
I think he means the is-ought dilemma inside the AGI—the distinction between its beliefs about what is and its goals for what it thinks ought to happen.