This “Not-quite-faith-based reductionism” stating that consciousness lies within the physics and is just not yet understood—is it valid? To me it seems rather strange to state such trust in the solution capacity of a certain scientific field, when you have to add that the opposite (that consciousness does not lie within physics) is just something that will be proven wrong when the opposite of the opposite is proven right...
This “Not-quite-faith-based reductionism” stating that consciousness lies within the physics and is just not yet understood—is it valid? To me it seems rather strange to state such trust in the solution capacity of a certain scientific field, when you have to add that the opposite (that consciousness does not lie within physics) is just something that will be proven wrong when the opposite of the opposite is proven right...