If it filters out Nash’s argument, Ideal Money, then it makes no sense and is completely irrational for it.
Well, since it’s an automated process, it filters anything, be it spam, Nash’ argument or the words of Omega itself. As I said, it’s a compromise. The best we could come up, so far. If you have a better solution, spell it out.
Are you also unwilling to discuss the content, and simply are stuck on my posting methods, writing, and character?
No, mine was just a suggestion for a way that would allow you to lubricate the social friction I think you’re experiencing here. On the other side, I am reading your posts carefully and reply when done thinking about.
Well, since it’s an automated process, it filters anything, be it spam, Nash’ argument or the words of Omega itself. As I said, it’s a compromise. The best we could come up, so far. If you have a better solution, spell it out.
You are defending irrationality. It filters out the one thing it needs to not filter out. A better solution would be to eliminate it.
No, mine was just a suggestion for a way that would allow you to lubricate the social friction I think you’re experiencing here. On the other side, I am reading your posts carefully and reply when done thinking about.
Sigh, I guess we never will address Ideal Money will we. I’ve already spent all day with like 10 posters, that refuse to do anything but attack my character. Not surprising since the subject was insta-mod’d anyways.
Well, as a last hail mary, I just want to say I think you are dumb for purposefully trolling me like this and refusing to address Nash’s proposal. Its John Nash, and he spent his life on this proposal, ya’ll won’t even read it.
There is no intelligence here, just pompous robots avoiding real truth.
Do you know who Nash is? It took 40 years the first time to acknowledge what he did with his equilibrium work. Its been 20 in regard to Ideal Money...
You are defending irrationality. It filters out the one thing it needs to not filter out. A better solution would be to eliminate it.
I wonder what my failure in communicating my idea is in this case.
Let me rephrase my argument in favor of filtering and see if I can get my point across: if we eliminated the filter, the site would be inundated with spam and fake accounts posts. By having a filter we block all this, and people willing to pass a small threshold will not be denied to post their contributions.
Sigh, I guess we never will address Ideal Money will we
In due time, I will.
I’ve already spent all day with like 10 posters, that refuse to do anything but attack my character.
That is unfortunate, but you must be prepared to make these discussions on the lon run. There are people that come here only once a week or only once every three months. A day can be enough to filter out the most visceral reactions, but here discussions can span days, weeks or years.
Its John Nash, and he spent his life on this proposal, ya’ll won’t even read it.
I am reading it right now, and exactly because it’s Nash I’m reading as careful as I can.
But what won’t fly here is insulting. Frustration for not being able to communicate your idea is something that we all felt, after all communicating clearly is hard. But if you let yourself below a certain standard of respect, you will be moderated and possibly even banned. That would allow you to communicate your idea even less.
I wonder what my failure in communicating my idea is in this case. Let me rephrase my argument in favor of filtering and see if I can get my point across: if we eliminated the filter, the site would be inundated with spam and fake accounts posts. By having a filter we block all this, and people willing to pass a small threshold will not be denied to post their contributions.
Let me communicate to you what I am saying. I bring the most important writing ever known to mankind. Who is the mod that moderated Nash? Where is the intelligence in that? Let’s not call that intelligence and try and defend it. Let’s call it an error.
In due time, I will.
Cheers! :)
That is unfortunate, but you must be prepared to make these discussions on the lon run. There are people that come here only once a week or only once every three months. A day can be enough to filter out the most visceral reactions, but here discussions can span days, weeks or years.
Do you think I am not prepared? I have been at this for about 4 years I think. I have writing 100′s maybe thousands of related articles and been on many many forums and sites discussing it and “arguing” with many many people.
I am reading it right now, and exactly because it’s Nash I’m reading as careful as I can.
Ah, sincerity!!!!!!!
But what won’t fly here is insulting. Frustration for not being able to communicate your idea is something that we all felt, after all communicating clearly is hard. But if you let yourself below a certain standard of respect, you will be moderated and possibly even banned. That would allow you to communicate your idea even less.
I have been insulted by nearly every poster that has responded. The mod insulted me, and Nash. I have never been more insulted so quick so much on any other site.
But if you let yourself below a certain standard of respect, you will be moderated and possibly even banned. That would allow you to communicate your idea even less.
Yup ban the messenger and ignore the message. Why would these people remain ignorant to Nash? How did Nash go 20 years without anyone giving his lectures serious thought?
If it filters out Nash’s argument, Ideal Money, then it makes no sense and is completely irrational for it.
Think about what you are saying, its ridiculous.
Are you also unwilling to discuss the content, and simply are stuck on my posting methods, writing, and character?
Well, since it’s an automated process, it filters anything, be it spam, Nash’ argument or the words of Omega itself. As I said, it’s a compromise. The best we could come up, so far. If you have a better solution, spell it out.
No, mine was just a suggestion for a way that would allow you to lubricate the social friction I think you’re experiencing here. On the other side, I am reading your posts carefully and reply when done thinking about.
You are defending irrationality. It filters out the one thing it needs to not filter out. A better solution would be to eliminate it.
Sigh, I guess we never will address Ideal Money will we. I’ve already spent all day with like 10 posters, that refuse to do anything but attack my character. Not surprising since the subject was insta-mod’d anyways.
Well, as a last hail mary, I just want to say I think you are dumb for purposefully trolling me like this and refusing to address Nash’s proposal. Its John Nash, and he spent his life on this proposal, ya’ll won’t even read it.
There is no intelligence here, just pompous robots avoiding real truth.
Do you know who Nash is? It took 40 years the first time to acknowledge what he did with his equilibrium work. Its been 20 in regard to Ideal Money...
I wonder what my failure in communicating my idea is in this case. Let me rephrase my argument in favor of filtering and see if I can get my point across: if we eliminated the filter, the site would be inundated with spam and fake accounts posts. By having a filter we block all this, and people willing to pass a small threshold will not be denied to post their contributions.
In due time, I will.
That is unfortunate, but you must be prepared to make these discussions on the lon run. There are people that come here only once a week or only once every three months. A day can be enough to filter out the most visceral reactions, but here discussions can span days, weeks or years.
I am reading it right now, and exactly because it’s Nash I’m reading as careful as I can.
But what won’t fly here is insulting. Frustration for not being able to communicate your idea is something that we all felt, after all communicating clearly is hard. But if you let yourself below a certain standard of respect, you will be moderated and possibly even banned. That would allow you to communicate your idea even less.
Let me communicate to you what I am saying. I bring the most important writing ever known to mankind. Who is the mod that moderated Nash? Where is the intelligence in that? Let’s not call that intelligence and try and defend it. Let’s call it an error.
Cheers! :)
Do you think I am not prepared? I have been at this for about 4 years I think. I have writing 100′s maybe thousands of related articles and been on many many forums and sites discussing it and “arguing” with many many people.
Ah, sincerity!!!!!!!
I have been insulted by nearly every poster that has responded. The mod insulted me, and Nash. I have never been more insulted so quick so much on any other site.
Yup ban the messenger and ignore the message. Why would these people remain ignorant to Nash? How did Nash go 20 years without anyone giving his lectures serious thought?