I . . . don’t think that’s a correct reading of the stats presented? Unless I’m missing something, “votes” counts each individual [up|down]vote each individual user makes, so there are many more total votes than total people.
‘Everyone’ paying a one-time $10 subscription fee would solve the problem.
A better (though still imperfect) measure of ‘everyone’ is the number of active users. The graph says that was ~4000 this month. $40,000 would not solve the problem.
Yes, I think you’re right. I was confused by Shoshannah’s numbers last night, but it was late and I didn’t manage to summon enough sapience to realise something was wrong and offer a correction. Thanks for doing that!
I . . . don’t think that’s a correct reading of the stats presented? Unless I’m missing something, “votes” counts each individual [up|down]vote each individual user makes, so there are many more total votes than total people.
A better (though still imperfect) measure of ‘everyone’ is the number of active users. The graph says that was ~4000 this month. $40,000 would not solve the problem.
Oh shit. It’s worse even. I read the decimal separators as thousand separators.
I’m gonna just strike through my comment.
Thanks for noticing … <3
Yes, I think you’re right. I was confused by Shoshannah’s numbers last night, but it was late and I didn’t manage to summon enough sapience to realise something was wrong and offer a correction. Thanks for doing that!