That would be because they disagree with the consensus in EA about what constitutes ‘the most impactful,’ ‘the greatest welfare,’ and/or ‘rigorous reasoning.’
I said that the belief must be reached from welfarist premises and rigorous reasoning, not from what the organization believes are welfarist premises and rigorous reasoning.
If they were sufficient, any NPO that could identify as an EA-aligned organization would do so.
I’m not sure what you mean by this. And it seems clear to me that lots of nonprofit orgs would not classify as EA orgs given my proposed criterion (note the clarification above).
I said that the belief must be reached from welfarist premises and rigorous reasoning, not from what the organization believes are welfarist premises and rigorous reasoning.
I’m not sure what you mean by this. And it seems clear to me that lots of nonprofit orgs would not classify as EA orgs given my proposed criterion (note the clarification above).