Not because it’s actually going to make Georgism more popular
I still insist that understanding population dynamics would make Georgism more popular. That’s the point of what I wrote. You’re just fixating, extrapolating, and nitpicking on a single phrase, which I have now removed from the page, since I want the emphasis in that bullet point to focus on the connection between Georgism, population dynamics, and resource conservation.
The problem is when you delude yourself and others into thinking that spreading one is a great strategy of spreading the other.
I’m not deluding myself. I firmly believe that accurately understanding population dynamics would make Georgism more popular. Are you disagreeing with that?
Population Dynamics are still part of Biological Realism, so what I wrote isn’t quite wrong, but I’ve edited the page to clarify what I meant.
Have you seen my webpage explaining it? I’m not convinced that George understood population dynamics at all.
I’m aware of this. I’ve written about it too.
I still insist that understanding population dynamics would make Georgism more popular. That’s the point of what I wrote. You’re just fixating, extrapolating, and nitpicking on a single phrase, which I have now removed from the page, since I want the emphasis in that bullet point to focus on the connection between Georgism, population dynamics, and resource conservation.
I’m not deluding myself. I firmly believe that accurately understanding population dynamics would make Georgism more popular. Are you disagreeing with that?