I bought Plus on day 1, and spent the first day inputting prompts that I didn’t get anywhere with (and had so many conversations) using 3.5. It answered usually on the first try.
My usecases have mostly been human-interaction (I have ASD) and time management (ADHD) related. It also worked great for questions like “I have tried X, Y, and Z, so don’t use them in your suggestions,” which 3.5 was bad at.
Another one where it shined was when talking about an acquaintance with many allergies that seemed to have nothing in common. It identified some common proteins between the foods and suggested new foods to try instead.
It also works around the X not Y problem. I asked it how to learn to like coffee given caffeine does not affect me, and it asked me for details of things I’ve tried. Eventually figured out why I want to learn to like coffee, and suggested alternatives to coffee which I could try at cafés which are not chocolate milk.
Recipes, too. I gave a list of ingredients to 3.5, and asked it to suggest an authentic Italian dish. Despite repeated prompting, it tried to give me something with most of the ingredients which would be anathema in Italy. 4 used a specific subset and gave suggestions that I could actually find.
On day 2, I helped a friend who was using 3.5, and I felt like I’d stepped back in time. Like, I was impressed by that thing? Definitely worth the price of admission for me.
I bought Plus on day 1, and spent the first day inputting prompts that I didn’t get anywhere with (and had so many conversations) using 3.5. It answered usually on the first try.
My usecases have mostly been human-interaction (I have ASD) and time management (ADHD) related. It also worked great for questions like “I have tried X, Y, and Z, so don’t use them in your suggestions,” which 3.5 was bad at.
Another one where it shined was when talking about an acquaintance with many allergies that seemed to have nothing in common. It identified some common proteins between the foods and suggested new foods to try instead.
It also works around the X not Y problem. I asked it how to learn to like coffee given caffeine does not affect me, and it asked me for details of things I’ve tried. Eventually figured out why I want to learn to like coffee, and suggested alternatives to coffee which I could try at cafés which are not chocolate milk.
Recipes, too. I gave a list of ingredients to 3.5, and asked it to suggest an authentic Italian dish. Despite repeated prompting, it tried to give me something with most of the ingredients which would be anathema in Italy. 4 used a specific subset and gave suggestions that I could actually find.
On day 2, I helped a friend who was using 3.5, and I felt like I’d stepped back in time. Like, I was impressed by that thing? Definitely worth the price of admission for me.