because such discussion would make it harder to morally pressure people into reducing carbon emissions. I don’t know how to see this as anything other than an adversarial action against reasonable discourse
ffs, because incentives. You’re playing tragedy of the commons, and your best move is to make there be more shared resources people can just take?
ffs, because incentives. You’re playing tragedy of the commons, and your best move is to make there be more shared resources people can just take?