It is not really a question but i will formulate it as if it was. Is current LLMs are capable enough to output real rationality exercises (and not a somewhat plausible sounding nonsense) that follows natural way (you dont get a “15% of the cabs are Blue” usually) of how information is presented in life? Can it give 5 new problems to do every day so i can train my sensitivity to prior probability of outcomes? In real life you don’t get percentages. Just a problems like: “can’t find my wallet, was it stolen?” Can they guide through solution process? There also:
P(D/~H) weight of evidence assigned by alternative hypotheses types of problems
How to notice hidden conjunctions (as in Linda problem)
Less obvious problems than probability of pregnancy, given that intercourse has occurred and probability of intercourse, given that pregnancy has occurred.
It is not really a question but i will formulate it as if it was.
Is current LLMs are capable enough to output real rationality exercises (and not a somewhat plausible sounding nonsense) that follows natural way (you dont get a “15% of the cabs are Blue” usually) of how information is presented in life? Can it give 5 new problems to do every day so i can train my sensitivity to prior probability of outcomes? In real life you don’t get percentages. Just a problems like: “can’t find my wallet, was it stolen?” Can they guide through solution process?
There also:
P(D/~H) weight of evidence assigned by alternative hypotheses types of problems
How to notice hidden conjunctions (as in Linda problem)
Less obvious problems than probability of pregnancy, given that intercourse has occurred and probability of intercourse, given that pregnancy has occurred.
Syllogisms.