When I think of Aumann’s agreement theorem, my first reflex is to average. You think A is 80% likely; my initial impression is that it’s 60% likely. After you and I talk, maybe we both should think 70%. “Average your starting beliefs”, or perhaps “do a weighted average, weighted by expertise” is a common heuristic.
But sometimes, not only is the best combination not the average, it’s more extreme than either original belief.
Old OB repost: Share likelihood ratios, not posterior beliefs
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/02/share-likelihood-ratios-not-posterior-beliefs.html
By Anna Salamon and Steve Rayhawk
Indubitably intriguing snippet: